There have been countless articles
about this topic, so I'll keep this one short. The digital medium has
indeed come a long way, even in the last two years. The cameras,
sensors, processors, options and digital-specific lenses are at a point now
(Feb 2007) where the decision to switch entirely to digital is a very tough one
to ignore. Not only just about mega pixels, but the way in which the newest
generation of digital cameras process light is extraordinary, if not just a
little expensive.
I entered the digital age first with an HP Slide Scanner
in 2002 and then in 2004 with a Canon Powershot G5 digital camera.
While being a light "Prosumer" grade camera, it has offered me a glimpse
into the possibilities (and also takes one helluva shot as well). Some
of the pictures in this website were in fact taken with this camera and have
produced some terrific results.
As of May 2007 I am now employing
a Pentax K10D for all my work. Shooting slides on my ZX-50 since 1996
has taught me how to take a good picture and breaking myself in with the
digital Canon G5 was sure a big help. Making the jump to a D-SLR has
proven to be an easy one. Just the other day my nine year old asked me
"Dad, can we have a slideshow?". I responded that the days of the
slideshow are behind us. Unless of course, I buy a digital image
projector.
So, is
digital better than film? Is film better than
digital?
I'll not put forth an answer here because I think today (May 2007)
there is no clear-cut winner. Although, my 100% move to digital though
may give some insight into my preference.